Excited to share our new software reviews product with the HN community and get your feedback. Over 2k individuals, including many YC founders, investors, and other notable folk, have left a review as well - please do add your voice if you like what you see.

At Siftery, we’ve taken a data first approach to software discovery. We’re now tracking 41k products and finding new ones every day, so reviews alone don’t cut it. However, we do think reviews can add critical context in the last mile, and we’ve structured our reviews feature around that.

Alex Wilhelm at Crunchbase made an interesting observation about our approach - “Siftery, however, is foregoing appending AI technology onto human-built recommendations. Instead, it is sticking humans onto AI-built recommendations.”

(https://news.crunchbase.com/news/ai-focused-recommendation-t...)

Second Measure is at it again! I've really enjoyed the numerous blog posts over the past few months, the data is unreal.

I should have known they offer this sort of thing. I tried spinning up an alias in the past but was unable to find where to do so. Maybe the UI has improved since I tried ~year ago.

They did shuffle things around about a year ago. Aliases are under Settings, in the Admin section.

Couldn't agree more. It's really hard to pinpoint the exact cause of such an outcome.

Love the look and feel of the site, great work! Which exchange is this data being pulled from (multiple?)?

Thanks!

There are different markets available, indicated by the white dropdown at the top.

Currently supporting GDAX and Gemini, but many more coming soon!

When I first read about this it wasn't immediately clear whether this was legit or a joke. Several days later and I still don't have any clarity.

I wonder if this is some sort of lawsuit protection? A way where they cannot get to his money?

this is my thinking. It probably won't work, but it smells like a cash sequestration maneuver.

Religious protections are disturbingly rock solid. Costs very little to try at least.

you'd be surprised. There's a long history of people trying and failing to do this and have it come out the way they expect. I lived for a while in an 1870s victorian house -- it's original owner tried to get it zoned as a "thiest house" in about 1900 so he could dodge property taxes. He didn't succeed, and the court case makes for some pretty amusing reading.

Which is one of the many reasons Ethereum's proof of stake is so interesting.

Proof of Steak mearly gives power to whomever has established wealth.

It is a marginal improvement over PoW, when the PoW algorithm is not computationally useful outside brute force hash lotteries and capital infrastructure race speculation.

Both PoS and PoW implementations should have heavy scrutiny on the distribution and minting rules for the base supply.

Ethereum doesn't actually have proof of stake yet