Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bobsmooth's commentslogin

KiCAD is pretty good.

HN used to be even more libertarian than it currently is.

I don't think HN is libertarian at all. In fact, I can barely tell the difference between reddit and HN now. Anti-capitalism is the dominant sentiment here now.

There is a small group of people who are quite openly attempting to make you, me, and everyone else obsolete. They’re doing it while blatantly lying that they’re not. Surprisingly, people aren’t receiving it well. Anti-capitalism is the dominant sentiment everywhere.

I love these analogue devices are being driven by a digital output. Using PWM is clever.


Is there one organization you trust to run the space internet for everyone on earth?


Maybe the entire approach is inappropriate.


Torturing prisoners not even convicted of a crime is something we don't do in America.


Well, not as official policy anyway.



I guess Fidelity doesn't want to help fund hate groups. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-so...


>I guess Fidelity doesn't want to help fund hate groups

Your "guess" is not the stated reason. FTA:

>“Consistent with our grant-making standards and practices, the organization is not an eligible grant recipient during the ongoing investigation.”

In fact, WRT Fidelity's actual disposition on funding hate groups, the SPLC reported in 2023 that their donor advised fund had been consistently used to that effect, including anti-LGBTQ, anti-government, anti-Muslim, and hard right groups.[0]

[0]https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/extremist-cryp...


They were paying confidential informants for tips they would use in investigations and pass to law enforcement. Not QUITE the same as being a hate group.


Sure, sure - that's why they went to lengths to ensure the money wasn't traceable back to them, right?


You mean like undercover cop trying real hard not to show his pay slip to mob members?


I'll point out that undercover cops are paid the same way as any other officer.


We're not talking about undercover cops, we're talking about confidential informants, people who by definition are not police.


The comment I was replying to was specifically about undercover cops.

That said - in the US, confidential informants are also paid directly by the agency or police department. While they sometimes (often?) paid in cash, the purpose and disbursement of those funds is closely tracked internally and auditable.

They're _not_ using shell companies to hide the fact that they're paying people for information. SPLC is. Why?

If paying in cash is sufficient for law enforcement, why would it be a problem for the SPLC? It seem clear to me that the intent is to hide the fact that they're doing it at all, not to protect the identities of their informants.


>Do you think you can even get that just taxing these companies?

If we go back to a 60% corporate tax rate, for sure.


They’ll just find a way to have $0 of profit. You have nothing to tax.


You could put a 100% tax on revenues (not profit) of AI companies and it would come out to a low couple hundred dollars per person per year right now.

A 60% corporate tax rate wouldn’t get to the levels needed for UBI proposals either.


>Says who?

The EU, just now.


So the EU is the objective truth of the universe, I guess


Yeah no that's definitely copyright infringement.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: