Writing a book takes like 2-3 years on average. Papers are published everyday. Having a cute two-person "conversational chat" w/ audio works for a lot of people vs. just reading a paper. "No benefit" to you perhaps. Don't generalize the lived experience.
Okay but this person is literally saying that listening with LLM tools isn't helping their understanding and they have to still read the paper... why listen at this point? Why listen using a tool that literally causes you to do more work?
We all have the same amount of time on this Earth, saying how great a tool is that is causing you to do more work is just... weird?
I've had a positive experience participating in ApartResearch.com research sprints. I was able to win (with my team) 4th place on the Defense Acceleration hackathon and then most recently on the Technical Governance Challenge, we won 1st place. I know they previously hosted some on Biological Xrisk for AI, which might be something you're interested in.
From these experiences, we actually got the opportunity to interview for fellowship positions, which we are considering. I think given your PhD in a hard science, you could link up with people that are interested in similar research as you are and then from there figure out where you want to publish.
This is my external portable monitor that I usually take with me for my computer. It gets power and video from one USB C cable it works with any computer that can do video over USB-C. It also works with my iPhone with a standard USB C cable.
It was since at least the iPhone 4. I still have the old digital AV connector from before they switched to lightning. It came with a hdmi port and a usb port. You could plug an SD card reader into the usb port and use it as an external HDD for transferring files.
reply