But who asked the model to solve that problem?

Why do we still need cryptic commands for an AI?

Many of those you don't need. For example Claude can switch to plan mode itself, either because you tell it to or because the model thinks it's useful. I still prefer using shift+tab to set my preferred mode before sending the message. It's a mix of token/time-efficiency and control.

Some others like permissions or mcp servers are things you don't want the model to be able to edit. Allowing the model to change its own security settings would make those settings moot.

I think Claude strikes the right balance in that it works well by default - default models, now default agent delegation, planning. But, obviously for power users, you can tweak settings as needed. Worst case if you have a problem, you can just ask Claude. Also, by default, you see tips when starting up Claude.

Epstein is Satoshi?

Or funded Satoshi.

Going nuclear in an earthquake zone is nuts.

This is from the so called "Deutschland Stack":

https://deutschland-stack.gov.de/gesamtbild/

But note there is also a "Euro Stack":

https://eurostack.eu/

Does MS Word support ODF?

Yes.

WAT? uv now belongs to Trump mega-donors? That is not good for the Python ecosystem.

„companies will ask for discounts when they know a service company is using AI tools“

„Insurance underwriters are seriously trying now to remove coverage in policies where AI is applied and there's no clear chain of responsibility“

I see a future coming, where everyone uses AI but nobody admits it.

You mean like today?

Nobody wants a biased AI like xAI. If I want a biased opinion, I can just ask my neighbor. A good AI feels like the collective knowledge of humanity at my fingertips, not the random ramblings of a lonely old man.

Peter Thiel - anagram - the reptile.