Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Spoom's commentslogin

Usually it's the Phillipines or an African country or something, but so very many times.

The better scams are now laundering NK through sub-Saharan Africa first.

Isn't that what they did?

Nope. Look at the flight track. They went all the way back.

> Nope. Look at the flight track. They went all the way back.

Good point, I was thinking they were over the ocean and that was naturally the closest airport, but it looks like they could have landed in e.g. Nova Scotia in a shorter time period.


I thought the same thing but it's still not a good look. The big tech companies offering this sort of thing should probably find ways to give better guarantees about data isolation, even if that requires e.g. clients paying additional fees.


Heya Tom, it's Bob, from the office down the hall


As of right now, it says Pro includes Code and Cowork. (At least, for me. There could always be A/B testing going on.)


There is A/B testing going on and for a while several pages on Anthropic's site did remove Code from pro (https://old.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1srzhd7/psa_claud...) if you want a lot more details.


While this is true, very often that is the impact of a third party vote in a federal election. See the election of one George W. Bush and the impact of Mr. Nader.


The product isn't Facebook, Quest, or Instagram. The product isn't advertising. The product isn't even people.

The product is the stock price.

Viewed through that lens, keeping the hype going at all costs makes sense.


The product is a platform Meta control free of Windows, Google or Apple.

That's what meta(verse) was suppose to build.


Yea - and what a foolproof product. Chase $HYPE, boost stock price, quietly deprecate $HYPE in favor of $NEXT_HYPE, stock doesn't correct, just goes up more

you could do this forever!


Realistically, if it in fact did take 5 minutes to do the cleanroom reimplementation, you could just process updates from the OSS source in realtime.


I love that this was ostensibly written by Vint Cerf.


It's listed in his computer science bibliography https://dblp.org/pid/c/VintonGCerf.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vint_Cerf#Author

Though the edit for that authorship to the RFC came much later. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1217/history/


Good lord, I can only imagine the wasted electricity.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: