My email does mention it clearly:

> Again, your organization's Copilot interaction data is not included in model training under this new policy, but we are excited for you to enjoy the product improvements it will unlock.

Great work! There is maybe some bug. When you click on one of the 4 "opposing" countries (e.g. Czech Republic, Poland), it scrolls down and then shows that majority of the representatives from the country actually support it. Is that intended? Won't that make people from those countries "relax" even though they might have an impact by contacting their represenatives?

this isn't really my opinion, but i think it's a perceived matter of _some_ principle vs just none, a lesser of 2 evils framing. if anthropic is on board with 99% of a government that i oppose, that could be seen as marginally better than openai being on board with 100% of a government that i oppose.

it does get a little weird thinking too hard about how the deal openai accepted was basically the same as the one anthropic was proposing. but this is my read of most of the sentiment in this direction.

Deals are totally different, OAI allows "all lawful use" (so basically anything)

Except most of the world's population, and in fact large fraction of the engineers and scientists working on these things, are not US citizens.

From Anthropics recent blog post: https://www.anthropic.com/news/detecting-and-preventing-dist...

> By examining request metadata, we were able to trace these accounts to specific researchers at the lab.

> The volume, structure, and focus of the prompts were distinct from normal usage patterns

Clearly some employees of Anthropic personally looked at individual inputs and outputs of their API

I thought that was pretty open? Even their more privacy-oriented Zero Data Retention agreement (which isn’t so easy to get on your business account) includes an exception “where needed to comply with law or combat misuse”

Who here reads the full terms of service of every Google product they use? The fact that they disabled the whole Google account without warning is damning.

They could have easily just blocked the Gemini / Antigravity use and and/or sent a "final warning" kind of email beforehand.

That issue exists with the current proposal as well or any proposal that leaves the enforcement on the website.

I think in addition to what OP said, the browser/device should let you set hard domain-level filters which are enforced by the browser/device.

This will not be ideal for applications / sites with mixed content, but gives the parent / guardian more control.

I would pay for a solution that aggregates these alternative payment systems that aren't tied to VISA and Mastercard and their rules.

Wero, RuPay, WeChat Pay / AliPay, Crypto (through 3p like coinbase or directly), etc.

And handles them in nice and unified API, with hooks for subscriptions, etc. (taking into account that some payment methods do not support recurring payments, so there should be some hook to send an email to the customer to renew manually, etc.)

Yeah, after looking more into sqldef and alternatives I stumbled on Atlas too and I like the explicit support for migration based flow for exactly the same reasons. I want to know exactly what kind of migration will be applied to my prod database beforehand.