Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OlegYch's commentslogin

all of this (except the wonderful idea for debugging) is available in intellij you should also take a look at their scala repl, which just rocks


Yep - have the Lighttable folks ever used IntelliJ IDEA?


Very good post. One point with which i cannot agree is "In fact, it is impossible to insert a new method that behaves like a normal collection method. "

Please see http://ideone.com/ePUHG An excerpt: import MyEnhancements._ println("qwe".quickSort) println(Array(2,0).quickSort) println(Seq(2,0).quickSort)


Miles Sabin's solution is also worth a look: https://gist.github.com/f83892f65f63b14a1f75

It uses dependent types which will be included by default in Scala 2.10. I don't consider this as "simple" but my point of view is that Computer Science is not "simple" :-). And having a language supporting that level of genericity is really helpful for type-safety and code reuse.


@OlegYch's solution also represents a good trade off of complexity vs. convenience: his solution is simpler but doesn't get along so nicely with type inference; mine gets on just fine with type inference, but is more complex and depends (no pun intended) on dependent method types. As ever YMMV.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: