This is exactly what people said about the "low code revolution".

Not saying that you are wrong, necessarily. But I think it's still a pretty broad presumption.

All people are annoying. It's still mean spirited in this instance. The author is likely reading all of these comments.

This is a fantastic idea. I completely endorse it. I hope a Valve employee sees this.

This does not only affect the US. They're ramming this kind of bullshit into law in Australia too. As rapidly as they can.

I'm so tempted to do this. But having to wipe my MBP is currently too much friction for me.

Liquid Glass is really killing my love for Apple products. I'll probably get a Framework and an Android phone for my next device purchases.

They really need to just admit it was a bad move and make like Sonic.

For my work device I've disabled Liquid glass completely. The accessibility options to reduce transparency and increase contrast improve the readability of the system a lot.

Booting a 15 year old Mac a while ago had me surprised how clean the interface actually is. The Dock/Desktop look a lot better in the old versions, and the age is mostly showing in apps like Finder which do look a bit dated.

I really hope someone at Apple is going to make the call to drastically reduce the Liquid Glass design and start complying with their own UX guidelines again.

The animations and layout of Liquid Glass aren't that bad, but it is really ugly in many ways.

They could have just made some layout improvements without trashing everything visually; that's sad, really.

The contour they put around the icon is really, really bad. How the fuck did they approve that?

Likewise, am still holding on to my iPhone 13 Pro for the foreseeable future. Even with Liquid Glass destroying my battery life.

In fact, if this phone died, thanks to Liquid Glass I would likely go buy an Android phone. Maybe a Graphene OS phone from Motorola.

If they were smart they would show those number here. It's like walking past an empty restaurant.

Don't boycott it! Just don't pay for it. Smash the free service hard.

Active users are worth a lot. It is signal that they are the chosen solution.

I have to agree with the previous user. I'm not brew installing a closed source daemon.

I'd have to imagine that moving this out to its own repo with Claude Code would be trivial so I don't understand the resistance.

This is a great idea. I look forward to seeing a proper repo for it.

I agree. It’s a neat idea and I’d be interested in seeing the details. A downloadable tarball is a lot better than nothing, but it still makes more work to evaluate a random project than I’m inclined to perform. It makes me assume the commit history is ugly in some way (being charitable and assuming the code itself isn’t). Hearing that it’s developed within a monorepo of unrelated projects and experiments isn’t inspiring either. Anyway, perhaps someone else will download the source and report back.

Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying any of those things are true, just that those are the first thoughts I have when someone says their source is open but makes it difficult to view. In this age in which it’s so trivial and commonplace to make source easily viewable.

I don't see the source in their tar archive.

it's just the homebrew cask and recipe.

In my experience they've always been this way. Real engineers lose to idiots that can knock out a nice Wordpress website. Now the way real engineers lose to idiots that can vibe out a nice UI.

Same same, but different.