Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ExpertAdvisor01's commentslogin

That's not true . A lot of bots are just headless chrome instances .

Just the single store closed .

Look at lowendtalk/box

They are already used extensively to kill people .

Rwanda controls significant amount of mines in eastern drc(north kivu) through the m23 rebels.


Yeah like blockchain


Cumex was not a tax loophole it was straight up fraud .


So imagine the enthusiasm of chasing "legal" practices.


It's interesting that we live in 2026 and people still don't understand the fees of credit card processing.

Visa charges only a Assessment fee the majority goes to Issuer Bank +PSP.

E.g: Interchange fee (0.8-1.8%): Paid by acquirer to issuer (card-holding bank)

Assessment fee (0.1-0.3%): Paid to card network (Visa, Mastercard)

Acquirer margin (0.3-0.8%): Retained by merchant’s payment processor


The army of middlemen with their hands out is the worst part, where you also have fees paid to the merchant bank, the iso/payment service provider, and a chain of agents. In disfavored industries like adult content, this can reach 15% or more, plus thousands in annual "high risk" fees (even if chargeback rate is good). It's a huge anticompetitive racket, and the sooner US can shake off Visa/MasterCard, the better off we'll be.


Add an extra fixed fee if you need 3D Secure (and equivalents). This should be covered already by the assessment and interchange fees to begin with.

Card networks' moat is their network effect. If you need to take a payment from someone around the world, cards are very convenient. Unless Pix and friends get to interop globally, cards will always have a place.


Any percentage based fee for processing a transaction is borderline criminal.


EU regulations limit those interchange fees to 0.2% for debit card transactions and 0.3% for credit card transactions so total costs are much lower for businesses. Cards have replaced cash even for small transactions in most European countries.


All should be free. Imagine if government decided to impose 3% revenue tax, yet these companies get a free pass.

If these networks cannot run this for free, then they should be nationalised and tax payer should cover it. It will be cheaper (because it will become non-profit) for everyone and better.


Cash handling also costs businesses money so I'm not sure it needs to be free, just strictly regulated.


Many banks already require monthly or annual payments for keeping an account with them. They also use the money from deposits to lend it at high interest rates. It is not like the banks are not extracting much more than a fair share of revenue from a captive market.


The banks and the payment processors are the real customers of the payment networks and they all do better when they can squeeze more money from the end users - the cardholders and the businesses. Pix cuts out these middlemen and that’s an existential threat to their business model, ergo an “investigation” by the Trump admin.


Probably they use flash sms(class 0 messages)


While the bill still faces a vote in the Bundestag, its passage is virtually guaranteed given the Grand Coalition’s significant majority.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: