Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A visitor bringing a pet onto the porch, and not into the residence, hardly seems like a violation of the no pet policy.


If I say no pets on my property what suddenly allows a small violation to be acceptable? Go find another place.


Mostly common sense. A stranger could walk their pet onto the property without permission. Is it the renter's job to run them off? If not, where is the line. There's clearly a grey area. The renter not allowing the visitor into the building (because the renter doesn't want pets) is reasonable. Preventing outside visitors? Grey area, and open to interpretation. I would consider it reasonable, and would push back if the landlord complained.


If you can't handle small violations, do not rent your home to a series of random strangers on the internet.


Certainly, but that doesn't justify spying on guests.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: